Subscribe

IMAGE IN CARDIOLOGY

DOI: 10.4244/EIJV11I8A184

Severe consequences of high-dose radiation

Ignacio Sanchez-Perez1*, MD; Alfonso Jurado-Roman1, MD, PhD; Natalia Pinilla-Echeverri1, MD; Manuel Marina-Breysse1, MD; Maria Thiscal Lopez-Lluva1, MD; Antonio Gil-Aguado2, MD; Fernando Lozano-Ruiz-Poveda1, MD; J. Antonio Garrido3, MD

A 58-year-old man was admitted with an anterior myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Severe lesions were found at the left anterior descending artery, the circumflex-marginal bifurcation, and the right coronary artery (chronically occluded) (Figure 1A-Figure 1C). Immediately after primary PCI, a second procedure was required due to stent thrombosis at the circumflex bifurcation previously treated. The overall duration of both procedures was 212 minutes (fluoroscopy: 71 minutes). Eighty-five cine runs were recorded, 47 in the right anterior oblique (RAO) view, 25-35º. The total skin dose was 5.2 gray, 2.5 of them in the same zone irradiated in RAO. After one month, the patient developed a skin lesion at the left scapular region. It progressed to a deep ulcer with bone exposure, needing plastic surgery two years later (Figure 1D-Figure 1I).

Figure 1. Coronary angiography and secondary skin lesions. A-C) Angiogram: three-vessel disease. D-I) Skin lesions: from slight erythema to a deep ulcer with bone exposure.

Cutaneous side effects are the main dose-dependent radiation consequences that are usually unrecognised, misdiagnosed, and under-reported. Their incidence is growing due to an increasing number of procedures and their complexity. For lengthy PCIs some measures should be implemented, namely: avoid high-intensity fluoroscopy mode, record more fluoroscopy images and fewer cine runs, minimise source-to-image distance, modify tube angle regularly and use fewer left anterior oblique angles.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Volume 11 Number 8
Dec 20, 2015
Volume 11 Number 8
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00856 Jul 22, 2022
Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECTION VIII study
Stocker TJ et al
free

10.4244/EIJV9I6A119 Oct 25, 2013
A review of radiation exposures associated with radial cardiac catheterisation
Park E et al
free
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
What were the key findings from the coronary angiography in this patient?
What type of skin lesion did the patient develop, and how did it progress over time?
How can healthcare providers better identify and manage radiation-induced skin lesions in patients undergoing complex interventional procedures?
What are the key considerations for balancing the benefits of complex interventional procedures with the risks of radiation exposure?
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2026 Europa Group - All rights reserved