Subscribe

Editorial

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00046

HALT – an evolving understanding of the mechanisms of formation and clinical relevance

Jonathon A. Leipsic1, MD; John K. Khoo2, MBBS

Since its initial description in 20151, hypoattenuating leaflet thickening (HALT) has been the subject of ongoing research. The incidence of HALT has been reported among all commonly used transcatheter heart valves (THVs) and various surgical bioprosthetic valves, based on data from nested registries of randomised trials as well as prospective and retrospective registries2. Its clinical significance is still under investigation. While the relationship of HALT with stroke and mortality is an area of question34, there is growing evidence that HALT is associated with higher valve gradients and earlier valve degeneration56. Potential mechanisms of HALT development have been proposed, ranging from reduction of neosinus flow, asymmetric valve expansion, and biological mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction6. Recognising this, it is generally accepted that valve design plays a potential role, and it is crucial not to assume that the incidence and mechanisms are the same across valve platforms6. Despite advancements in knowledge, there remain outstanding questions. In this issue of EuroIntervention, Ishizu et al7 look to provide answers. The authors took a subset of the OCEAN-TAVI registry to investigate the incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of HALT following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the latest generation of the short frame, intra-annular and balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 valve, the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (S3UR; Edwards Lifesciences). This study is particularly important given the unique design of the S3UR valve with anticalcification treatment of the leaflets and modification of the commissural leaflet suspension method for the smaller-sized valves. The authors are commended for their thorough analysis. In addition to assessing HALT according to Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC)-3 criteria8, the study’s independent core laboratory used four-dimensional cardiac computed tomography (CT) data acquired at 30 days to analyse THV geometry. This encompassed a host of thoughtfully defined variables including oversizing, expansion, canting, alignment, eccentricity, deformation index, and leaflet expansion. The analysis yielded noteworthy results. The incidence of HALT in this study population was 21.3%, which is similar to prior reports for SAPIEN 3 valves9. Unique, though, to this analysis is the exploration of the relationship between HALT and the revised commissural leaflet suspension dedicated to the 20 mm and 23 mm THVs. Notably, these modifications were not associated with a signal for HALT, with a comparable incidence between THV sizes ≤23 mm and ≥26 mm (22.1% vs 20.2%). Haemodynamic alterations were also assessed. The presence or absence of HALT did not show a significant association with increased gradients, consistent with findings from prior studies9. This relationship changed when assessing HALT according to severity. HALT when stratified by a 25% cutoff, by a 50% cutoff, and by involvement of more than one leaflet was significantly associated with higher post-implant gradients. HALT should therefore be considered along a spectrum of severity, rather than as a binary diagnosis. The authors highlight that cross-sectional measures of valve deformation index and asymmetrical leaflet expansion were the two geometric variables independently associated with a higher incidence of HALT. A high deformation index indicates underexpansion and corresponds to the hourglass-shaped stent frame, while leaflet asymmetricity represents both underexpansion and uneven expansion5. Previous studies also identified these variables as independent predictors of HALT in both balloon-expandable and self-expanding valves9. While providing valuable analyses, this study, like all such reports, leaves lingering questions. To start, the authors simply present 30-day data. Evaluating data out to one year and beyond would be valuable, and we hope the authors will pursue longer-term outcomes, including haemodynamic changes, survival, and treatment response. Also, although RESILIA leaflets did not prevent short-term HALT, this anticalcification technology may still be relevant to durability. Longer-term echocardiographic and CT data will demonstrate whether the S3UR reduces the incidence of valve degeneration. It would be good to explore this going forward, and it is helpful to provide evidence that supports and directs technological advancements. Interestingly the authors opine that in patients with adverse root features and challenging sizing which would behove post-balloon dilatation, a supra-annular self-expanding valve might make more sense. The authors propose that underfilling would be associated with deformation and underexpansion and, in turn, HALT and therefore inform the recommendation for a different valve platform. While this is an intriguing idea, several variables must be considered, and further study is needed before making a confident recommendation. In closing, we thank the authors for their thoughtful, involved, and important analysis. It represents the first investigation of HALT related to the RESILIA technology and the commissural modification in smaller S3UR valves. The findings overall align with prior such analyses of different valve platforms. While incremental and needed, we would advocate that the authors build on this work and continue this journey by undertaking intermediate and long-term analysis. This will inform the durability of the S3UR valve but also address unresolved issues regarding the relationship of HALT with long-term outcomes and valve degeneration.

Conflict of interest statement

J.A. Leipsic discloses consulting fees from Circle CVI and HeartFlow; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Arineta; and stock or stock options from HeartFlow. J.K. Khoo has no conflicts of interest to declare.


References

Volume 21 Number 22
Nov 14, 2025
Volume 21 Number 22
View full issue


Key metrics

Suggested by Cory

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00996 May 10, 2024
Performance and outcomes of the SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA transcatheter heart valve in the OCEAN-TAVI registry
Yamamoto M et al
free

Editorial

10.4244/EIJ-E-25-00012 May 5, 2025
Can a CT scan characterise and predict HALT evolution?
Tirado-Conte G and Nombela-Franco L
free

Research Correspondence

10.4244/EIJ-D-25-00255 Sep 15, 2025
Redo-TAVI with the ACURATE platform for failure of short-frame transcatheter heart valves
Tarantini G et al

SHORT REPORT

10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00137 Jun 14, 2018
First experience with the 34 mm self-expanding Evolut R in a multicentre registry
Harnath A et al
free

Original Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-24-01112 Jul 7, 2025
Four-year durability of the Myval balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve
Jain A et al
Chat with Cory
Hello , I'm Cory and I will do my best to answer your questions about this article. Please remember that this is an experimental feature, and that I'm still learning.
What are the key findings of the 30-day data on the incidence of early leaflet thrombosis (HALT) with the S3UR valve?
How does the authors' propose that the RESILIA anticalcification technology may be relevant to the valve's durability?
What is the authors' recommendation for using a supra-annular self-expanding valve in patients with adverse root features and challenging sizing?
What are the potential limitations or unanswered questions identified by the authors in this study?
X

PCR
Impact factor: 9.5
2024 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2025)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2025 Europa Group - All rights reserved